Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int Health ; 14(3): 336-338, 2022 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1462365

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This paper presents a descriptive analysis of the perceptions of Kenyan midwifery educators regarding the early impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the continuity of midwifery education. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 51 midwifery/clinical medicine educators from 35 diploma training colleges from all eight regions of Kenya. Educators' concerns and satisfaction regarding the delivery of training during the early phases of the pandemic were expressed as proportions on a three-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the educators, 76% were extremely concerned about face-to-face teaching during the pandemic; 96% of educators had started delivering virtual teaching (VT), with only 41% being extremely confident in facilitating VT; and 97% were unsatisfied with the measures in place in their institutions to continue face-to-face teaching. CONCLUSION: To minimise the impact of COVID-19 on midwifery education in Kenya, capacity building for VT and mitigation measures for safe in-person training are urgently needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Midwifery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Midwifery/education , Pandemics , Pregnancy
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 152(2): 242-248, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1125314

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate utilization costs of spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) and cesarean delivery (CD) for pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at the largest teaching hospital in Lagos, the pandemic's epicenter in Nigeria. METHODS: We collected facility-based and household costs of all nine pregnant women with COVID-19 managed at the hospital. We compared their mean facility-based costs with those paid by pregnant women pre-COVID-19, identifying cost-drivers. We also estimated what would have been paid without subsidies, testing assumptions with a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Total utilization costs ranged from US $494 for SVD with mild COVID-19 to US $4553 for emergency CD with severe COVID-19. Though 32%-66% of facility-based cost were subsidized, costs of SVD and CD during the pandemic have doubled and tripled, respectively, compared with those paid pre-COVID-19. Of the facility-based costs, cost of personal protective equipment was the major cost-driver (50%). Oxygen was the major driver for women with severe COVID-19 (48%). Excluding treatment costs for COVID-19, mean facility-based costs were US $228 (SVD) and US $948 (CD). CONCLUSION: Despite cost exemptions and donations, utilization costs remain prohibitive. Regulation of personal protective equipment and medical oxygen supply chains and expansion of advocacy for health insurance enrollments are needed in order to minimize catastrophic health expenditure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Maternal Health Services/economics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/economics , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Cesarean Section/economics , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Female , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Nigeria , Parturition , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL